Starting branch2 off of branch1 vs starting branch2 off of master and merge in branch1

I have a feature branch (branch1) that was approved but not yet merged into to master (have to wait for deployment CI to be fixed). I want to get started on another branch (branch2) which needs branch1's changes in it. Would it make more sense to create my branch2 off of master and then merge in branch1?...or just create branch2 off of branch1?
Is there any difference between these approaches?



Read more here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67526354/starting-branch2-off-of-branch1-vs-starting-branch2-off-of-master-and-merge-in-b

Content Attribution

This content was originally published by HarLinton at Recent Questions - Stack Overflow, and is syndicated here via their RSS feed. You can read the original post over there.

%d bloggers like this: